Skip to main content
Discuss

Free assessment · answer in a few minutes

AI Search Visibility Assessment

For marketing and digital leads and founders who want to know whether search and AI assistants can find the firm and describe it correctly, and what to fix first.

Built by XONIK. Nothing you enter leaves this page.

Line illustration of arcs from a business out to the assistants that read about it, blocked early, drawn as arcs from a dot, one blocked.

In brief

This assessment shows whether search engines and AI assistants can find your firm and describe it correctly. You answer questions on access, clarity, identity, evidence and checking. You get a visibility band, the two areas to work on first and a report to keep. It reads only your answers, not your site, and is not an audit.

Step 1 of 5: Access

0 of 15 answered

  1. Access (current step)
  2. Clarity (not yet reached)
  3. Identity (not yet reached)
  4. Evidence (not yet reached)
  5. Checking (not yet reached)

Access

Access is whether search engines and AI assistants are permitted and able to read your pages at all. A page that cannot be fetched cannot be found, quoted or recommended, whatever else is done to it.

1. Do you know what your robots file allows for each crawler that search engines and AI assistants document, on every host name you use?
2. Beyond the robots file, could a firewall, a content delivery network, a bot-management rule or a login wall be turning those crawlers away?
3. With scripts switched off and without signing in, does the substance of each key page still appear, and have you checked that no page carries an instruction to stay out of the index or out of snippets?

Clarity

Clarity is whether your pages say in plain words what you do, for whom and for what problem, and answer the questions buyers ask. A system that cannot tell what a page is about will not describe it accurately to anyone else.

4. Does each key page open with a sentence that says what you do, for whom and for what problem?
5. Do your pages answer the questions buyers ask, directly and near the top?
6. For reports, guides and other material you gate, is there a public page saying what it concludes?

Identity

Identity is whether the firm has one name, one description and one set of facts, repeated consistently on your site and everywhere else it appears. Mixed signals about who you are are passed along as mixed answers.

7. Is there one written version of the firm's name, one-sentence description and list of services, and is it used?
8. Does the organization information on your site, including its structured data, match the visible text and point to your official profiles?
9. Do old profiles, directory entries and listings you do not control carry outdated names, descriptions or addresses?

Evidence

Evidence is what stands behind your claims: sources beside the facts, a stated method and descriptions of you on sites you do not control. A claim that rests on your word alone is the easiest to pass over or to get wrong.

10. Do credible sites you do not control describe what you do in words close to your own?
11. Do you publish the method and limits behind your main claims?
12. On your key pages, does each factual claim have its source beside it?

Checking

Checking is the habit of asking assistants what a buyer would ask and acting on what comes back. What assistants say changes without notice, so what you saw last time is no evidence of what is said now.

13. Have you put the questions a buyer would ask to more than one AI assistant, and read the answers?
14. When an answer names you wrongly, leaves you out or names a competitor, what happens?
15. Do you know whether visits or enquiries reach you through AI assistants?

Answer the 3 questions left on this step to go on.

On this page

What does this assessment answer about how buyers find you?

It answers whether search engines and AI assistants can reach your pages, understand what the firm does, recognize it as one entity and find support for what you claim, and whether anyone looks at what they say. It reads only your answers, so it cannot say how you rank or what an assistant says today, and no tool can promise a citation. It shows where the chain between a buyer's question and your name is weakest.

In what order does a buyer's question meet your firm?

  1. 01

    The crawler arrives

    Access: can search engines and assistants fetch your pages at all?

  2. 02

    The page is read

    Clarity: does the text say what you do, for whom and for what problem?

  3. 03

    The firm is recognized

    Identity: is there one name and one description wherever the firm appears?

  4. 04

    The claim is weighed

    Evidence: does anything outside your own pages support what you say?

  5. 05

    The answer is checked

    Checking: does anyone ask assistants what a buyer would ask?

Who should answer, and how long does the sitting last?

Three people tend to hold the answers: whoever leads marketing or digital, whoever looks after the site and whoever keeps the firm's profiles up to date, which in a small firm may be one person. It does not take long. Where you do not know, pick the lowest card, because an unknown is a gap until someone has checked.

Is this the right check for your situation?

Use it when

  • You suspect buyers research through assistants and you have never looked at what they are told
  • A redesign, a rename or a move of the site is coming and you want to know what could break

Use something else when

  • You need to know how you rank today, which the assistants and the search providers' own reports can show
  • You want a technical audit of crawling and indexing, which needs someone to inspect the site

The trade is breadth against proof. A short sitting gives you a map of where to look, and each answer still depends on what you remember.

What do the bands say, and why can a high one still disappoint?

The bands run from Hard to find to Findable and watched. They describe how ready you are to be found, not what an assistant will say; an assistant weighs its own sources and changes them without notice, so Easy to find means the way is clear and nothing more. The top band adds the habit of checking, which is the only part that keeps the rest true. Comparing each area's points with those on offer picks the two to fix first.

Which check settles each low answer?

Each area has a check that needs no specialist.

AreaA check you can run yourselfWhat you are looking for
AccessOpen the robots file on every host name you useA rule that shuts out a crawler you want
ClarityRead the first sentence of a key page to someone outside the firmWhether they can say back what you do
IdentitySearch for the firm's name and compare every profileDifferences in name, description or address
EvidenceTake one key page and see which claims have a source beside themClaims that stand on your word alone
CheckingAsk each assistant, in a new session, what a buyer would askAnswers that are wrong, leave you out or name a rival

What do people ask before using the AI search visibility assessment?

Does the assessment look at my website or ask an AI assistant about us?

No. It reads only your answers, so it cannot say how you rank or what an assistant says about you today. What it shows is where the chain between a buyer's question and your name is weakest, so you know which checks to run yourself.

If we score in the top band, will AI assistants recommend us?

No. The bands describe how ready you are to be found, not what an assistant will say. An assistant weighs its own sources and changes them without notice, so Easy to find means the way is clear and nothing more. No tool can promise a citation.

How do I check an answer I am not sure about?

Pick the lowest card, because an unknown is a gap until someone has checked. Then run a check that needs no specialist: read the robots file on every host name, ask someone outside the firm what a key page says you do, and ask each assistant a buyer's question.

Is this a substitute for a technical SEO audit?

No. A technical audit of crawling and indexing needs someone to inspect the site. This gives you a map of where to look. It suits you if buyers may research through assistants and you have never seen what they are told, or if a redesign or site move is coming.

Want a second view of how buyers find you?

Describe what you are weighing in a few lines. A senior practitioner replies with a suggested first conversation.